Hair loss is one of the only health issues most people “track” with a mirror, overhead lighting, and a phone camera. The problem is that those tools are noisy. Small changes in angle, hair length, humidity, styling, and even the part line can make the same scalp look better or worse—without any real biological change underneath.

So when someone is consistent, patient, and careful—and still feels like treatment “isn’t working”—it’s often not because they did something wrong. It’s usually because the plan didn’t match the biology, the timeline, or the type of hair loss that’s actually happening.

1) The wrong target: when shedding isn’t the same as pattern hair loss

Many hair-loss regimens are built around androgenetic alopecia (male/female pattern hair loss). That’s a common diagnosis—but it’s not the only one.

A few situations where a plan can be “perfect” and still miss the mark:

    •    Telogen effluvium (stress/illness/medication-related shedding): shedding is diffuse and can start months after a trigger. The priority is identifying and addressing the trigger—not necessarily escalating hair-growth products.

    •    Inflammatory scalp conditions: irritation, flaking, or dermatitis can increase shedding and reduce tolerance for topicals.

    •    Alopecia areata or scarring alopecias: these behave differently and often need a dermatologist-led diagnostic approach.

When this matters: sudden shedding, patchy loss, scalp pain/burning, redness, scaling, or rapid change.

When it doesn’t: slow, gradual recession or thinning at typical pattern areas with a stable scalp.

Who it applies to: anyone whose “hair loss” is mostly shedding rather than gradual miniaturization.

Who it does not apply to: people with classic, slowly progressive pattern thinning and no scalp symptoms.

2) The timeline problem: biology moves slower than expectations

Hair growth cycles are slow, and early phases can be confusing. Even reputable treatments may require months to assess fairly. For example, finasteride may take at least ~3 months to show an effect for male pattern hair loss, and benefit is tied to continued use.  

Minoxidil—topical or oral—can also come with an early period of temporary increased shedding when starting, which may resolve within weeks.   And many guides note it can take six months or more to judge whether a regimen is helping.  

When this matters: if you’re judging results week-to-week or changing the plan every month.

When it doesn’t: if your main goal is simply “I want to start something low-effort and track over time.”

Who it applies to: anyone early in treatment, especially the first 1–6 months.

Who it does not apply to: people with rapid progression, concerning symptoms, or signs of scarring/inflammation (those need a different pathway).

3) Non-response is real: some follicles don’t “activate” certain treatments well

A hard truth: even when someone uses treatment correctly, not everyone responds the same way.

One example is topical minoxidil: its activity depends on an enzyme in the follicle (a sulfotransferase) that helps convert it into its active form. Research suggests a meaningful portion of people may respond poorly to topical minoxidil because of lower baseline activity of that enzyme.  

This is not a moral failing or a “you didn’t apply it right” issue. It’s biology and variability.

When this matters: if adherence is solid and enough time has passed, but there is no stabilization or visible change.

When it doesn’t: if the regimen has been inconsistent or too short to judge.

Who it applies to: people using topical approaches correctly for long enough to evaluate.

Who it does not apply to: people whose primary issue is shedding from a trigger (where “response” looks different and may lag behind recovery).

4) “Doing everything right” can still include hidden friction

Most routines fail quietly—not dramatically. People are usually consistent in general, but small, repeated gaps add up.

Common examples that don’t feel like “non-compliance,” but change outcomes:

    •    Micro-skips: missing doses on weekends, travel days, or busy weeks

    •    Unstable variables: changing dose, brand, or delivery method while also adding supplements, devices, or new shampoos

    •    Scalp barrier issues: irritation that reduces absorption or makes you subconsciously apply less

    •    Progress tracking errors: comparing wet vs dry hair, different hair length, different lighting, or different part placement

This is why a plan that is technically “correct” can still be hard to evaluate in real life.

When this matters: if you’re adding multiple new products “to help” but can’t tell what’s doing what.

When it doesn’t: if your routine is stable and your tracking method is consistent.

Who it applies to: people using multiple interventions at once (meds + devices + supplements + frequent switches).

Who it does not apply to: people on a single, stable plan with consistent tracking over months.

5) Where labs help—and where they can distract

Online hair-loss content often treats labs like a guaranteed missing piece. In reality, labs are sometimes useful, sometimes neutral, and occasionally a distraction.

Lab context can be helpful when there are signs that hair loss may overlap with broader health factors (for example: thyroid dysfunction, iron status/ferritin, vitamin D, and other contributors). There is research exploring associations between hair loss patterns and abnormalities in values like ferritin, vitamin D, and thyroid markers, though the evidence doesn’t always translate into predictable regrowth just from supplementing.  

A practical way to think about labs:

    •    They’re most useful when symptoms, history, or the pattern of loss suggests something beyond classic pattern thinning.

    •    They’re less useful as a reflexive “hair loss panel” when the story strongly fits androgenetic alopecia and there are no red flags.

When this matters: new fatigue, menstrual changes, sudden shedding after illness, restrictive diet/weight loss, or other systemic symptoms.

When it doesn’t: stable, long-term pattern thinning without other symptoms.

Who it applies to: people with mixed signals or new-onset diffuse shedding.

Who it does not apply to: people whose presentation is clearly pattern-related and stable.

⸻

A grounded way to move forward

If hair loss treatment feels like it’s failing despite real effort, the next step usually isn’t “try harder.” It’s to get clearer on what type of hair loss is most likely, what outcome you’re actually tracking, and whether enough time has passed to evaluate fairly. Clarity reduces wasted time, wasted money, and unnecessary frustration.

If you want structured next steps, you can review Avendano Health’s hair-loss information here: https://avendanohealth.com/hair-loss 

If you’re comparing options (topical vs oral approaches, timelines, and what “response” realistically looks like), that page can help you frame the decision and questions to ask.

And if you decide you want a clinician-reviewed plan rather than trial-and-error, you can use the hair-loss page as a starting point to learn what that process looks like—without pressure or promises.